**

The upcoming Kanwar Yatra 2025 is already generating significant buzz, and not just for the expected millions of devotees. A crucial legal challenge is brewing, with the Supreme Court set to hear a plea against the Uttar Pradesh government's directive mandating QR code-based digital payments for eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route. This decision has sparked widespread debate, raising concerns about accessibility, digital literacy, and the potential impact on small businesses. This article delves into the details of the case, explores the arguments for and against the QR code mandate, and analyzes its potential implications for the annual pilgrimage and the broader digitalization drive in India.

Kanwar Yatra 2025: A Massive Religious Pilgrimage

The Kanwar Yatra, a significant Hindu pilgrimage, sees millions of devotees traversing vast distances to collect holy water from the Ganges River in Haridwar and Gaumukh and offer it at Shiva temples. The yatra typically takes place during the month of Shravan, and 2025 promises to be no different, with expectations of a massive turnout. The pilgrimage is characterized by its immense scale, posing significant logistical challenges for state governments in terms of infrastructure management, crowd control, and ensuring the well-being of the pilgrims. The Uttar Pradesh government, in anticipation of the 2025 Yatra, introduced a controversial measure aiming to streamline transactions and combat tax evasion.

UP Govt's QR Code Mandate: The Genesis of Controversy

The Uttar Pradesh government's decision to make QR code-based digital payments mandatory for all eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route has ignited a firestorm of criticism. The stated rationale behind this directive is twofold:

• Combating Tax Evasion: The government argues that the QR code system will enhance transparency and improve tax collection, as digital transactions leave a clear audit trail.
• Promoting Digital Payments: The initiative aligns with the government's broader push towards a cashless economy and increased digital literacy.

However, critics argue that this move overlooks several crucial factors:

• Digital Divide: A significant portion of the Kanwar Yatra participants, particularly those from rural areas, lack access to smartphones and sufficient digital literacy to navigate QR code-based payment systems. This could potentially exclude them from accessing essential services.
• Burden on Small Businesses: Many small eateries along the pilgrimage route operate on a small scale and may lack the technological infrastructure and expertise to adopt QR code-based payment systems. The implementation costs, coupled with potential technical glitches, could place an undue burden on these businesses.
• Lack of Adequate Infrastructure: Reliable internet connectivity might not be readily available throughout the entire Kanwar Yatra route, rendering the QR code system ineffective in several areas.

The Supreme Court Plea: A Fight for Accessibility and Inclusivity

A public interest litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the UP government's mandate. The petitioners argue that the directive is discriminatory, impractical, and infringes on the rights of both pilgrims and small business owners. They contend that the government has failed to adequately consider the digital divide and the potential hardships faced by vulnerable sections of the population.

The plea highlights several key concerns:

• Violation of Fundamental Rights: The petitioners argue that the mandate violates the fundamental right to equality and the right to carry out business without unreasonable restrictions.
• Lack of Consultation: The PIL alleges that the government failed to consult with stakeholders, including eatery owners and representatives of the Kanwar Yatra participants, before implementing the directive.
• Need for Alternatives: The petitioners suggest alternative methods for ensuring tax compliance and promoting digital payments that are more inclusive and less disruptive.

Arguments Presented Before the Court

The Supreme Court hearing is expected to witness a rigorous debate on the merits of the QR code mandate. The petitioners will likely emphasize the importance of accessibility and inclusivity, highlighting the potential for marginalization of vulnerable groups. The UP government, on the other hand, is likely to defend its decision by emphasizing the importance of tax compliance and the promotion of digital transactions as a key step towards economic progress.

Implications and Future Outlook

The Supreme Court's decision in this case will have far-reaching implications, not only for the Kanwar Yatra 2025 but also for the broader policy discourse surrounding digitalization and its impact on marginalized communities. A ruling against the mandate could set a precedent for future initiatives aimed at promoting digital payments, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of accessibility and inclusivity.

The outcome will also impact small business owners and their ability to participate in the economic opportunities presented by large religious gatherings like the Kanwar Yatra. A balanced approach, acknowledging both the government's goals and the concerns of the petitioners, will be crucial in shaping future policies related to digitalization and public welfare.

Keywords: Kanwar Yatra 2025, Supreme Court, Uttar Pradesh, QR code, digital payments, eateries, pilgrimage, religious gathering, PIL, digital literacy, accessibility, inclusivity, tax evasion, cashless economy, India, Hindu pilgrimage, Shravan, Haridwar, Gaumukh, fundamental rights, small businesses, digital divide, public interest litigation.