**

FCC and Virginia LPFM Stations Reach Settlement Over Underwriting Violations: Implications for Low-Power Radio

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and several Low-Power FM (LPFM) radio stations in Virginia have reached a settlement agreement resolving allegations of underwriting identification violations. This landmark case highlights crucial compliance issues for LPFM broadcasters nationwide and underscores the importance of understanding FCC regulations regarding sponsorship identification. The agreement sets a precedent that could impact how LPFM stations across the country manage their advertising and underwriting practices. This article delves into the specifics of the settlement, its broader implications for the LPFM industry, and offers essential guidance for broadcasters striving for compliance.

Understanding the Allegations: Underwriting and Sponsorship Identification

The FCC's investigation centered on alleged violations of Section 317 of the Communications Act, which mandates clear and accurate identification of sponsorships and underwriting announcements on radio broadcasts. The allegations against the Virginia LPFM stations involved instances where underwriting announcements were either insufficiently disclosed or failed to meet the FCC's requirements for clarity and prominence. This includes issues such as:

• Insufficiently prominent announcements: The volume of the underwriting announcement was not sufficiently loud enough compared to the program audio.
• Lack of clear identification: The announcement failed to explicitly state "paid for by [sponsor name]" or a similar clear identification.
• Inadequate timing and frequency: Underwriting announcements were not properly spaced throughout the programming or were omitted altogether.
• Failure to maintain records: Proper records of underwriting agreements and announcements were not kept for FCC review.

These violations, while seemingly minor, can carry significant consequences for broadcasters, including hefty fines and potential license revocation. This case underscores the critical need for LPFM stations to adhere meticulously to these seemingly simple regulations.

The Settlement Agreement: Key Terms and Implications

The settlement between the FCC and the Virginia LPFM stations avoids costly litigation and potential penalties. Details of the financial terms of the agreement remain confidential, but it includes a comprehensive compliance plan. Key aspects of the settlement include:

• Formal acknowledgement of violations: The stations admitted to the underwriting identification violations.
• Implementation of a compliance plan: The stations agreed to implement a comprehensive program to ensure future compliance with FCC rules regarding sponsorship identification. This plan likely includes staff training, improved record-keeping procedures, and the adoption of standardized underwriting announcement procedures.
• Ongoing monitoring and reporting: The FCC will monitor the stations' compliance with the agreed-upon measures for a specified period. Regular reports on their compliance will be submitted to the FCC.
• Potential for future penalties: While the current settlement avoids further penalties, future violations could lead to additional sanctions.

This settlement demonstrates the FCC's commitment to enforcing its regulations regarding sponsorship identification, particularly within the growing LPFM sector. The agency's actions send a strong message to all broadcasters, regardless of size or power, that compliance is paramount.

The Importance of LPFM Compliance: Avoiding Future Violations

The Virginia case serves as a valuable lesson for all LPFM broadcasters. Strict adherence to FCC regulations is not merely a matter of avoiding penalties; it's essential for maintaining public trust and ensuring the integrity of the broadcast airwaves. To avoid similar violations, LPFM stations should:

• Invest in staff training: All on-air personnel and those involved in managing underwriting agreements should receive comprehensive training on FCC regulations concerning sponsorship identification.
• Implement robust record-keeping systems: Maintain detailed records of all underwriting agreements and broadcast logs, including precise times and durations of underwriting announcements. These records must be readily available for FCC inspection.
• Develop standardized announcement procedures: Create clear internal guidelines outlining the required content, timing, and prominence of underwriting announcements.
• Regularly review compliance procedures: Conduct periodic internal audits to assess compliance with FCC regulations and identify potential areas for improvement.
• Seek legal counsel: Consult with legal professionals specializing in communications law to ensure compliance with all applicable regulations.

Broader Implications for the LPFM Community

The outcome of this settlement holds significant implications for the wider LPFM community. It underscores the need for increased awareness and proactive measures to ensure compliance with FCC regulations. This case highlights the importance of:

• Industry-wide education and outreach: Organizations representing LPFM stations should enhance their efforts to educate members about FCC regulations and provide resources for compliance.
• Collaboration and resource sharing: LPFM stations can benefit from sharing best practices and experiences to enhance overall compliance across the sector.
• Increased regulatory clarity: The FCC could consider initiatives to clarify or simplify certain regulations to minimize the risk of unintentional violations.

Conclusion: Staying Compliant in the Ever-Changing Landscape of Low-Power Broadcasting

The settlement between the FCC and the Virginia LPFM stations serves as a cautionary tale and a call to action. For LPFM broadcasters, maintaining compliance with FCC regulations, particularly those surrounding underwriting identification, is not just about avoiding penalties; it's about upholding the integrity of the broadcast medium and ensuring the long-term viability of their stations. By prioritizing compliance and investing in proper training and procedures, LPFM stations can contribute to a healthy and thriving low-power radio landscape. Staying informed about changes in FCC rules and regulations is crucial for continued success in this dynamic industry.